Shashi, remember when i posited that there would be less death if women were given control of all the weapons in the world, just that one thing? you thought it was funny, and what is is funny because it is, and everyone knows it, even though it is not
one probably with this video you show us is it is muddling up the definitions of time, eternity falls into the minute, like distance has been removed by electronics, and seeming to contradict as we don't remember that there is no such thing as a contradiction and we feels it is the heart of the conflict
one probably with this video you show us is it is muddling up the definitions of time, eternity falls into the minute, like distance has been removed by electronics, and seeming to contradict as we don't remember that there is no such thing as a contradiction and we feels it is the heart of the conflict
so where does it mean, where do we get off saying to our demographic, given the fact of 100 mortality rate by medical standards, what is he trying to tell us?
Immortality is about time.
It is "the infinite present."
So it is eternal.
All eternal things are immortal.
So this is not a contradiction.
A good logician can prove the existence of God with Ps and Qs or just by defining God as The Infinite Present
Can we give this present to each other?
If the observer is the observed, then all of us must die for any of us to die. The imagination will schiz the limit of your perception, not only of experience, the external, but taking the experience self-consciously, watching yourself containing yourself and in this internal place some religions will tell you that you can try to perceive your Life as an illusion, not intellectually, to intellectually convince yourself that you see nothing, this is madness. What is to be seen, is that there is never any contradiction. If there is a contradiction it is something internal you have cooked up.
The observer IS what is. It is the observed. It this observing itself. Eternally at moment.
In America, we say we wear each others moccasins because it is common knowledge that the culture of America before the Europeans who called themselves Christians arrived, the cultures of the 500 nations already here were very much one in the spirit, they did not think of themselves as separate from their environment and worked with the land together, they didn't even try to count things with numbers, they had sustenance, less and more sufficient, they could no more set up surveying by with tapes and levers the borders than a capitalist could say that ownership of property isn't perfectly natural.
Not that they didn't mark out their territory like at animals. The party never ended for them because they never had to fight over the Land, or for it for that matter, how terrifying white men on horses with guns must have been to those mothers of nations. Or any men with guns anywhere now. What's a mother to do? Girls are second class citizens. That is what is now. Is it right? Is what is just what it is afterall? This culture that began at the dawn of dawn has not been completely destroyed. The entire continent surveyed with a level and tape and so it became much more difficult to conceptualize grace.
What is is immortality. That is what is is. Men with guns are so afraid of Mom they can't see her except in the crosshairs. The contradiction is because he knows that they are both only human no matter what, although with his gun he can delude himself into thinking there is something that is that is not. The boy takes his gun and brings home game. He doesn't cheat and tame the food first. He's not a poacher. He's a hunter. And his venison is waiting to be marinated.
By all means, rid yourself of illusions, all instances of contradiction, when something that is is not.
Not really.
Is he never wrong?
Immortality is about time.
It is "the infinite present."
So it is eternal.
All eternal things are immortal.
So this is not a contradiction.
A good logician can prove the existence of God with Ps and Qs or just by defining God as The Infinite Present
Can we give this present to each other?
If the observer is the observed, then all of us must die for any of us to die. The imagination will schiz the limit of your perception, not only of experience, the external, but taking the experience self-consciously, watching yourself containing yourself and in this internal place some religions will tell you that you can try to perceive your Life as an illusion, not intellectually, to intellectually convince yourself that you see nothing, this is madness. What is to be seen, is that there is never any contradiction. If there is a contradiction it is something internal you have cooked up.
The observer IS what is. It is the observed. It this observing itself. Eternally at moment.
In America, we say we wear each others moccasins because it is common knowledge that the culture of America before the Europeans who called themselves Christians arrived, the cultures of the 500 nations already here were very much one in the spirit, they did not think of themselves as separate from their environment and worked with the land together, they didn't even try to count things with numbers, they had sustenance, less and more sufficient, they could no more set up surveying by with tapes and levers the borders than a capitalist could say that ownership of property isn't perfectly natural.
Not that they didn't mark out their territory like at animals. The party never ended for them because they never had to fight over the Land, or for it for that matter, how terrifying white men on horses with guns must have been to those mothers of nations. Or any men with guns anywhere now. What's a mother to do? Girls are second class citizens. That is what is now. Is it right? Is what is just what it is afterall? This culture that began at the dawn of dawn has not been completely destroyed. The entire continent surveyed with a level and tape and so it became much more difficult to conceptualize grace.
What is is immortality. That is what is is. Men with guns are so afraid of Mom they can't see her except in the crosshairs. The contradiction is because he knows that they are both only human no matter what, although with his gun he can delude himself into thinking there is something that is that is not. The boy takes his gun and brings home game. He doesn't cheat and tame the food first. He's not a poacher. He's a hunter. And his venison is waiting to be marinated.
By all means, rid yourself of illusions, all instances of contradiction, when something that is is not.
Not really.
Is he never wrong?
No comments:
Post a Comment